Vicarious Liability for Intentional Wrongdoing: Myth or Fact?
/The question is not whether the tortious conduct is intentional or negligent. The question is whether the wrongdoer is acting within the scope of their employment.
Read MoreThe question is not whether the tortious conduct is intentional or negligent. The question is whether the wrongdoer is acting within the scope of their employment.
Read MoreMs. Daniels argument that no contract was formed is remarkably strong, and certainly, stronger than I initially thought before really digging into this.
Read MoreI obviously have no insight into the thinking of Ms. Daniels’ counsel, but I would guess that looking at his facts, he felt that the theory of the failure to fully form an agreement was a path of lesser resistance than fraud.
Read MoreThe central fact that Ms. Daniels hangs her … um …. hat on is that Donald Trump did not sign the agreement. If you hear that the dispute involves an attempt to enforce a contract and one party didn’t sign, the statute of frauds is a logical place for your mind to go.
Read MoreOne of the first questions to address is precisely what is Ms. Daniels’ claim? At its heart she claims that Donald Trump did not sign the nondisclosure agreement, and the legal consequence of that is that the agreement cannot be enforced against her. Those are points “A” and “B” but what is the path between the two?
Read MoreIf one is going to stand on an objection as a basis for refusing disclosure of information or documents, the objection had better be stated with specificity and supported by a detailed explanation of why the particular interrogatory or request is objectionable.
Read MoreAll is right with the world again – at least for this case.
Read MoreThe insurer's argument was pretty basic – we can instruct the jury on issues that would determine coverage and have them answer interrogatories that will remove doubt as to whether our duty to indemnify the insured is in fact triggered. What’s not to love?
Read MoreThe very serious topic of sexual assault has been seemingly all over the news lately. Practically every day there are new allegations against some public figure. The response of the accused obviously varies. Sometimes, however, the response involves announcing a plan to sue for defamation.
Read MoreBut what if a Plaintiff delays for years in bringing a claim? There is an argument to be made that in such circumstances, an award of prejudgment interest would be incompatible with the plaintiff’s duty to mitigate his damages ...
Read MoreIn March of this year, HB 223, which amended KRS 360.040, was signed into law, and became effective on June 29, 2017....
Read MoreP.O. Box 17216, Ft. Mitchell, KY 41017
jason@jckuhlmanlaw.com
859.801.2990
HOME | ABOUT | PRACTICE AREAS | BLOG | CONTACT
All content © 2017
unless otherwise noted.